Saturday, November 12, 2016

Paper no: - 11.Discuss Frantz Fanon’s way of looking toward The Man of Color and the White Woman.

To evaluate my assignment, click here


Name: - chintavan bhungani
Course: - M.A. English
Semester: - 3
Batch: - 2015-2017
Enrolment no: - PG15101006
Submitted to: - Smt. S.B.Gardi Dept. of English MKBU
Email id: - cnbhungani7484@gmail.com
Paper no: -   11.the postcolonial literature 
Topic: -  Discuss Frantz Fanon’s way of looking toward The Man of Color and the White Woman.

ANS.

INTRODUCTION:-
 Frantz Omar Fanon was a Martiniquais-French psychiatrist, philosopher, revolutionary, and writer whose works are influential in the fields of post-colonial studies, critical theory, and Marxism. Black Skin, White Masks is one of Fanon's important works. In Black Skin, White Masks, Fanon psychoanalyzes the oppressed Black person who is perceived to have to be a lesser creature in the White world that s/he lives in, and studies how navigates the world through a performance of White-ness. Particularly in discussing language, he talks about how the black person's use of a colonizer's language is seen by the colonizer as predatory, and not transformative, which in turn may create insecurity in the black's consciousness He recounts that he himself faced many admonitions as a child for using Creole French instead of "real French," or "French French," that is, "white" French. Ultimately, he concludes that "mastery of language [of the white/colonizer] for the sake of recognition as white reflects a dependency that subordinates the black's humanity"
Fanon is best known for the classic analysis of colonialism and decolonizationThe Wretched of the Earth. Fanon's three books were supplemented by numerous psychiatry articles as well as radical critiques of French colonialism in journals such as Esprit and El Moudjahid.
Ø Fanon's writings
o   Black Skin, White Masks (1952), (1967 translation by Charles Lam Marksman: New York: Grove Press)
o   A Dying Colonialism (1959),
o   The Wretched of the Earth (1961),
The book is divided in 8 chapters. In these eight chapters, Fanon talks about psychology of white colonizers and black people’s desire to be like white men. He talks about issue of language, marriage between white and black and psychology behind it, white mindset of ruling, 
  1. The Black Man and Language
  2.  The Woman of Color and the White Man
  3. The Man of Color and the White Woman
  4. The So-Called Dependency Complex of the Colonized
  5. The Lived Experience of the Black Man
  6. The Black Man and Psychopathology
  7. The Black Man and Recognition
  8. By Way of Conclusion


 The Man of Color and the White Woman
The following is based on Chapter 3 of Frantz Fanon’s “Black Skin, White Masks” (1952): “The Man of Color and the White Woman”:
Fanon, a black psychiatrist from Martinique, starts by saying of himself:
I want to be recognized not as Black but as White. … Who better than the white woman to bring this about? By loving me she proves to me that I am worthy of a white love. I am loved like a white man. I am a white man.
Yes, it gets worse:
Between these white breasts that my wandering hands fondle, white civilization and worthiness become mine.
Having lost half his readership, Fanon then turns to the case of Jean Veneuse, the hero of an autobiographical novel by Rene Maran, “Un homme pareil aux autres” (1947).
“By loving me she [white woman] proves to me that I am worthy of a love. I am loved like a white man. I am a white man.”
Jean Veneuse came to France from the Caribbean when he was three or four. He lost his parents and was brought up by boarding schools in France, the only black student in a sea of white. He has a lonely childhood. When the other students go home for the holidays he is left alone at school.  He withdraws into himself and into books: Aurelius, Tagore, Pascal and other writers become his only friends.
He grows up French and falls in love with a white woman. He wonders about his motives.
Maybe it is simply because he was brought up European and so desires European women just like any other man in Europe. Or, contrariwise, maybe it is because he is black:
the common mulatto and black man have only one thought on their mind as soon as they set foot in Europe: to gratify their appetite for white women.
Most of them, including those with lighter skin who often go so far as denying both their country and their mother, marry less for love than for the satisfaction of dominating a European woman, spiced with a certain taste for arrogance.
And so I wonder whether … I am unconsciously endeavoring to take my revenge on the European female for everything her ancestors have inflicted on my people throughout the centuries.
Yet when he works in Africa as a civil servant he proves to be just as bad as the whites, complete with the native girl in his hut. So maybe it is not revenge that he wants but to separate himself from his race or even somehow to become race less.
But Fanon says that Veneuse’s troubles run much deeper than that: he was left alone in the world by his mother as a small boy and is hung up on that. So he is afraid to love and be loved. He holds everyone at arm’s length, even the woman he wants to marry. Therefore we cannot draw any general conclusions from Veneuse’s case.


Paper no: - 10 The woods are lovely, dark and deep, but I have promises to keep, and miles to go before I sleep, and miles to go before I sleep, discuss the philosophical meaning of the poem.


To evaluate my assignment, click here


Name: - chintavan bhungani
Course: - M.A. English
Semester: - 3
Batch: - 2015-2017
Enrolment no: - PG15101006
Submitted to: - Smt. S.B.Gardi Dept. of English MKBU
Email id: - cnbhungani7484@gmail.com
Paper no: -   10 the american literature
Topic: - The woods are lovely, dark and deep, but I have promises to keep, and miles to go before I sleep, and miles to go before I sleep, discuss the philosophical meaning of the poem.

ANS.

Introduction:-
                              Robert Lee Frost was an American poet. His work was initially published in England before it was published in America. He is highly regarded for his realistic depictions of rural life and his command of American colloquial speech. The present poem is one of best known poems –it reminded and inspired Nehru –service of humanity and countrymen.
Robert Frost (1874-1963), a poet of rare Pulitzer-Prize fame, who was hailed though belatedly in 1961, by President John F. Kennedy as “an unofficial poet Laureate of America”, is, the most widely read American poet in his own country as well as abroad. Like the English Romantic poet, Wordsworth, Frost was a poet of Nature, man and Human Life, but unlike Wordsworth Frost’s treatment of nature, man and human life was altogether different from the treatment of the pioneer of the English romantic tradition. It is the difference between the two that establishes Frost as a unique poet of American experience.
Frost has been called “A Poet of Nature”, “Poet of Paradoxes”, “Poet of Darkness”, “Poet of Romanticism”, “Poet of Tensions”, “Poet of Barriers”, “Poet of Contraries”, and above all “a modern poet”.
The present poem of Robert frost can be considered as it poem of karma yoga or a person’s sense of duty. No doubt the literally meaning of this poem is very simple but the applied meaning is significant. Robert frost himself at a particular stage in life worked as a farmer and it has been said that he could not gate expected price of the products which he had gone to sell in the market. While coming back in a wave of disbacked the present poem was composed.
The poet knows whose woods they are and the owner lives in the village. He want mind if the poet stops that for some time to enjoy the beauty of that place but when he makes a pose there his horse considers it strange, uneven because there is no farm house of is stable. The Morse realizes that it is and uneven pose because that is the darkest evening of the year and the lake is also frozen the same horse gives a shake to its harness bee to remind the poet that their pose there is an uneven. The only other sound except of that bee is the whistling sound because of blowing of the wind.
The poet is reminded that the woods have got enough beauty they are lovely, deep and dark but the poet has got many promises to keep before I sleep there he has miles to go on and on.
The implied   meaning of the poem is more appealing and convincing. The poet knows whose woods they are but that person is not and individual that owner is god almighty who watches everything. The presence of horse also demands and interpretation it is not merely in this poem as an animal but the inner craving of an individual which does not allow that person to be in the company of nature. The horses reminding to the poet is a sign of how man is occupied with material life which does not allow man to be with nature.
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep, 
   The last stanza of the poem in which the poet describes the woods are lovely dark and deep has a note of Disperse it. The word “dark” suggest poets dispatch or pessimism because he could not gate expected price of his agricultural products. The sleep is not a common sleep in the last two lines of the poem. Its stands for death and here this poem becomes a poem of karma yoga. A man may a came across beautiful sights, places and individuals but man must not make that the final stage, man should go on and on doing is beauties and karmas. The day man stops performing his duty and karma. It is a day of his death though that person may leave biologically. The lesson of the poem is importance of karma in life and duty is more important than beauty.
·        Rhyme scheme of this poem :- a-a-b-a
·        Here poem shows a simple meaning but its dark meaning is about life, death, sorrow and journey. The simple lyric can be read/interpreted in various other ways also. It reminds him that his journey has a purpose and ‘miles to go before’ he escapes into dreamy world of snowy woods.
It is not merely what poet once experience on one evening. it expresses the conflict which everyone has felt, between the demands of practical life with its obligations to others and the poignant desire to escape into land of daydream/enjoyment. No overt symbolism. But this experience of poet symbolizes experiences common to all. One has to fulfill certain duties; there are promises to be fulfilled before one ‘sleep’.

                The duties may of this world or the other world. Promises may be those which are made to fellow being or to the supreme being. Snow woods and beautiful evening is temptation-it may lead to loss of consciousness. This loss of consciousness leads to normal death.

Ø Conclusion:-
At the end we can say that ‘sleep’ is ‘reward’ one receives. ‘Sleep’ can also to read to as ‘Nirvana’- Moksha. The ultimate release from the journey of life –death –life. But still the soul has ‘miles to go before it achieves this blissful state of sleep. Thus, the life is a journey; soul is mounted on the horse/ horse carriage. The traveler is tempted to deviate from his path. The worldly pleasure attract soul .but the consciousness (bell) wakes or guards him and reminds him of his journey and promises –but I have promises to keep/and miles to go before I sleep. . Frost’s hired man is a victim of the impact of industrialization on contemporary America. He is exploited by others not only in the cities but even in the countryside.

To evaluate my assignment, click here



paper no.9 A history of the age background reading A.c.ward’s twentieth century literature.

To evaluate my assignment


Name: - chintavan bhungani
Course: - M.A. English
Semester: - 3
Batch: - 2015-2017
Enrolment no: - PG15101006
Submitted to: - Smt. S.B.Gardi Dept. of English MKBU
Email id: - cnbhungani7484@gmail.com
Paper no: -   9 the modernist  literature
Topic: - A history of the age background reading A.c.ward’s twentieth century literature.
ANS:-
 

From this image of chart we can see that how the twentieth century begins .this age is one of most important and very interesting age because all the new and different things and changing in writing of literature is done in this age. The modern age is very different from the other ages in English Literature. The modern age is known as “Modernist Movement” in English Literature. The period of modern age is 1915 to 1945 and this age is totally different from the Victorian age.
                    The people of modern age reject old forms and trying to do a new technique and new style. Even in literature also many of the poet and writer wants to do different and bring something new in their writing.
                   The terms modern and modernism pertain to the beliefs and philosophy of the society during the late 19th to the early 20th century. Because the concept has two different accepted meaning.           
Literary Movements and Periods:-
                                                              Literature constantly evolves as new movements emerge to speak to the concerns of different groups of people and historical periods. In this age there are two movements start; Artistic and Literary Movements.
Absurd, literature of the (c. 1930–1970): A movement, primarily in the theater, that responded to the seeming illogicality and purposelessness of human life in works marked by a lack of clear narrative, understandable psychological motives, or emotional catharsis. Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot is one of the most celebrated works in the theater of the absurd.
Beat Generation (1950s–1960s): A group of American writers in the 1950s and 1960s who sought release and illumination though a bohemian counterculture of sex, drugs, and Zen Buddhism. Beat writers such as Jack Kerouac (On the Road) and Allen Ginsberg (Howl) gained fame by giving readings in coffeehouses, often accompanied by jazz music.
Dadaism (1916–1922): An avant-garde movement that began in response to the devastation of World War I. Based in Paris and led by the poet Tristan Tzara, the Dadaists produced nihilistic and antilogical prose, poetry, and art, and rejected the traditions, rules, and ideals of prewar Europe.
Lost Generation (c. 1918–1930s): A term used to describe the generation of writers, many of them soldiers that came to maturity during World War I. Notable members of this group include F. Scott Fitzgerald, John Dos Passes, and Ernest Hemingway, whose novel The Sun Also Rises embodies the Lost Generation’s sense of disillusionment.
Magic realism (c. 1935–present): A style of writing, popularized by Jorge Luis Borges, Gabriel García Márquez, Günter Grass, and others, that combines realism with moments of dream-like fantasy within a single prose narrative.
Modernism (1890s–1940s): A literary and artistic movement that provided a radical breaks with traditional modes of Western art, thought, religion, social conventions, and morality. Major themes of this period include the attack on notions of hierarchy; experimentation in new forms of narrative, such as stream of consciousness; doubt about the existence of knowable, objective reality; attention to alternative viewpoints and modes of thinking; and self-preferentiality as a means of drawing attention to the relationships between artist and audience, and form and content.
High modernism (1920s): Generally considered the golden age of modernist literature, this period saw the publication of James Joyce’s Ulysses, T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land, Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway, and Marcel Proust’s In Search of Lost Time.
Nouveau Roman (“New Novel”) (c. 1955–1970): A French movement, led by Alain Robbe-Grillet, that dispensed with traditional elements of the novel, such as plot and character, in favor of neutrally recording the experience of sensations and things.
Postcolonial literature (c. 1950s–present): Literature by and about people from former European colonies, primarily in Africa, Asia, South America, and the Caribbean. This literature aims both to expand the traditional canon of Western literature and to challenge Eurocentric assumptions about literature, especially through examination of questions of otherness, identity, and race. Prominent postcolonial works include Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, V. S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas, and Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children. Edward Said’s Orientalism (1978) provided an important theoretical basis for understanding postcolonial literature.
Postmodernism (c. 1945–present): A notoriously ambiguous term, especially as it refers to literature, postmodernism can be seen as a response to the elitism of high modernism as well as to the horrors of World War II. Postmodern literature is characterized by a disjointed, fragmented pastiche of high and low culture that reflects the absence of tradition and structure in a world driven by technology and consumerism. Julian Barnes, Don DeLillo, Toni Morrison, Vladimir Nabokov, Thomas Pynchon, Salman Rushdie, and Kurt Vonnegut are among many who are considered postmodern authors.
Surrealism (1920s–1930s): An avant-garde movement, based primarily in France, that sought to break down the boundaries between rational and irrational, conscious and unconscious, through a variety of literary and artistic experiments. The surrealist poets, such as André Breton and Paul Eluard, were not as successful as their artist counterparts, who included Salvador Dalí, Joan Miró, and René Magritte.
The Twentieth Century, Modernisms and Modernity
·       Society and Culture:-
                                                The twentieth century introduces a cultural period in which individuals not only reject the past but also question the very basis of knowledge and consider the possibility that knowledge and concepts once thought to be fixed and objective are instead constantly shifting and subjective.
Philosophers and thinkers such as Friedrich Nietzche, Henri Bergson, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud challenged nineteenth-century science and the positivist confidence in its ability to explain both the physical and social worlds in completely rational terms.
World War I had a powerful impact in its aftermath, causing Europeans to reconsider their very belief systems and leading to widespread dissatisfaction with the authorities who, many believed, were motivated by greed, class exploitation, and hunger for power.
A growing interest in psychology influenced by the theories of Sigmund Freud contributed to a new emphasis on the internal reality of individuals, the importance of the self, and the alienation of the self in modern society.
New studies in the relationship between reality and appearance led to the philosophies of phenomenology and existentialism as represented in the philosophical writings of Martin Heidegger and Jean-Paul Sartre.
After the Second World War, the rise of Communism, the gradual disintegration of colonialism, and the exponential development of technology, existentialism flourished in the 1940s and 1950s as individuals struggled to find meaning in an increasingly fragmented and confusing world.
A growing awareness of a variety of other cultures that have differing worldviews than traditional European or American ones undercut the assumptions of “cultural parochialism” and led to pluralistic and postcolonial perspectives.
·       The Bloomsbury Group:-
                                                          He Bloomsbury Group was a small, informal association of artists and intellectuals who lived and worked in the Bloomsbury area of central London. Most prominent of these was novelist and essayist Virginia Woolf. In all, only about a dozen people at any one time could have called themselves members of the group. Beginning shortly before 1910, the Bloomsbury Group gathered at irregular intervals for conversation, companionship, and the refueling of creative energy. The members of Bloomsbury, or “Bloomsberries,” would more or less maintain allegiance to their mutual philosophy of an ideal society, even through a World War and three decades of tectonic shifts in the political climate. They had no codified agenda or mission. They were not political in the ordinary sense of the word. Most importantly, there was no application or initiation required to become a member. Bloomsbury was an informal hodgepodge of intellectual friends, and one either merited inclusion to that circle or one did not. No rules of order, as in a committee, governed the way in which Bloomsbury managed their interactions. Instead, they held impromptu dinners and gatherings where any number of topics was the subject of serious discussion and contemplation. These intellectual exchanges served as the main influence on later work by individual members. By no means were all members in full agreement on all subjects. Some of Bloomsbury’s most stimulating ideas and writings were borne out of internal disagreement and strife. One can safely say that each member of Bloomsbury was leftist in his or her politics, although as individuals they expressed their politics in very different ways.
A significant fact about the Bloomsbury Group is that the members, for the most part, did not achieve their greatest fame until later in life. The Group held its discussions and parties while all the participants were still virtually unknown. The men of Bloomsbury were students at King’s College and Trinity College, constituents of Cambridge University. They were almost all high achievers and active in student life, yet one must imagine that they didn’t quite fit in as well as other students. Many of the Bloomsberries held particular ideas on human society which at the time seemed beyond radical. For example, the noncritical assessment of homosexuality, however appropriate today, was considered a serious moral error in the early twentieth century. Indeed, many of the Bloomsberries called into question the idea of traditional monogamous marriage. Several advocated for and practiced polyamory – multiple, consensual romantic partners. The idea of this level of sexual liberation in Edwardian England was unspeakable. In a sense, they made it very easy for their generation to dismiss them as quacks and deviants. However, none could deny that the Bloomsbury Group brought a great deal of intellectual clout to bear on any issue of the day.
·       Members of the Bloomsbury Group
v Strachey, Giles Lytton (1880-1932)
v Bell, Clive (1881-1964)
v Keynes, John Maynard (1883-1946)
v Fry, Roger (1866-1934)
v Grant, Duncan (1885-1978)
v MacCarthy, Desmond (1877-1952)
v Bell, Vanessa Stephen (1879-1961)
v Woolf, Leonard (1880-1969)
v MacCarthy, Mary (1882-1953)
v Stephen, Thoby (1880-1906)
v Stephen, Adrian (1883-1948)
v Carrington, Dora (1893-1932)
v Sydney-Turney, Saxon (1880-1962)

1. Decay of Character and Hero:-
Psychological theories of Sigmund Freud created an impact on modernist writers, Writers found that the traditional method of portraying characters was erroneous, Death of both hero and villain
2. Decay of Plot:-
Modern story does not follow a chronological order, Modern stories do not have a beginning or end, Modernist literature requires an active reader
3. Stress on Individual:-
Individual is more important for modernist writers than society, in a modern story, there are no universally accepted values of social conduct 
4. Realism:-
Modern stories are realistic, for writers, there is no such thing as absolute truth; everything is relative.  , Modernist literature is a portrayal of life as it is.
CONCLUTION:-
At the end of the twentieth century, as geopolitical boundaries blurred and shifted, an increased recognition of the diversity of cultural identities in ethnic, gender, and sexual issues led to a correspondent pluralism in writing that depicts the full range of human diversity. Included in these new perspectives is attention to the efforts of postcolonial cultures to develop a consciousness apart from that of their colonizers.


WORK CITED:-
Ø http://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nawest/content/overview/modern.htm


To evaluate my assignment





Saturday, April 2, 2016

Paper no.8:-cultural studies - Four Goals of Cultural Studies



DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH MAHARAJAH KRISHNAKUMARSINHJI BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY

CONCEPT OF CULTURE AND ANARCHY BY MATTHEW ARNOLD

                      Semester:-M.A SEM 2                               Paper no.8:-cultural studies

ROLL NO:-6

ENROLLMENT NO:- PG15101006
EMAIL ID:-cnbhungani7484@gmail.com
Blog id:- chintavanbhungani201517.blog.spot.com

Four Goals of Cultural Studies

Introduction:-
The word “culture” itself it so difficult to pin down, “cultural studies” is hard to define. As far as cultural study is concerned, it has broader meaning because we see from various perspective then an individual can know what actually it lays in the meaning. Therefore firstly it becomes my job to deconstruct the meaning of culture as the meaning is elaborated according to different critics so at first we will have glance on the meaning of culture.

What is culture?
 ‘Culture’, derives from ‘Cultura’ and ‘colere’ meaning ‘to cultivate’. It also meant ‘to honor’ and ‘project’ by the 19th century in Europe it tastes of the upper class (elite).

          ‘Culture’ is the mode of producing meaning and ideas. This ‘mode’ is a negotiation over which meanings are valid. Elite culture controls meanings because it controls the terms of the debate.

What is Cultural Study?
Cultural studies is the science of understanding modern society, with an emphasis on politics and power cultural studies is an umbrella term used to look at a number of different subject. Categories studied include media studies including film and Journalism, sociology, industrial culture, globalization and social theory.

“Cultural Studies is not a tightly coherent unified movement with a fixed agenda, but a loosely coherent group of tendencies, issues, and questions.”

Cultural studies is composed of elements of Marxism, Post structuralism and Postmodernism, Feminism, Gender studies, anthropology, sociology, race and ethnic studies, film theory, urban studies, public policy, popular culture studies and Postcolonial studies: those field that concentrate on social and cultural forces that either create community or cause division and alienation.
















First Goals: cultural studies transcends the confines of a PARTICULAR DISCIPLINE such as literary criticism or history:-

“Cultural studies transcend the confine of a particular discipline such as literary criticism or history. “practiced in such journal as critical inquiry , representations, and boundary 2 , cultural studies involves scrutinizing the cultural phenomenon of a text – for example Italian opera, a Latino telenovela, the architectural styles of prisons, body piercing and drawing conclusion about the change in textual phenomena over time.

 Cultural studies are not necessarily about literature in the traditional sense or even about “art”. In their introduction to cultural studies , editors Lawrence grossberg,cary nelson , and Paula trencher emphasize that the intellectual promise of cultural studies lies in the attempts to “ cut across diverse social and political interests and address many of the struggles within the current scene.”

 Intellectual works are not limited by their own “borders” as single texts, historical problems or disciplines , and the critic’s own personal connections to what is being analyzed Amy also be described.
      Henry Giroux and others write in their Dalhousie review  manifesto that cultural studies practitioners are “resisting intellectuals” who see what they do as “an emancipator project.” Because it erodes the traditional disciplinary divisions in most institutions of higher education.

 Second goals:- Cultural Studies is politically engaged:

          The cultural critics see themselves as “Oppositional” not only within their own discipliner but to many of the power structures of society at large. The cultural critics question inequalities within power structures and try to find out the models for restructuring relationships among the dominant and “minority” of “Subaltern” discourses. The meaning and individual subjectivity are culturally constructed, they can thus be reconstructed. This type of idea, taken to a Philosophical extreme, demise the autonomy of the individual whether an actual person or a character in literature, a rebuttal of the traditional humanistic “Great man” or “Great Book” theory and a relocation of esthetics and culture from the ideal realms of taste and sensibility into the arena of a whole society’s everyday life as it is constructed.

3.   Cultural studies deny the separation of “high” and “law” or elite and popular culture:

You might hear someone remarks at the symphony or at art museum “I came here to get a little culture”. Being a “cultured” person used to mean being acquainted with “highbrow” art and intellectual pursuits. But is not culture also being found with a pair of tickets to a rock concert? Cultural critic’s today work to transfer the term popular, folk or urban. Following theorists Team Baudrillard and Andreas Hussein, cultural critics argue that after world war-II the distinction among high, low and mass culture collapsed and they cite other theory such as Pierre Boudoirs and Dick Hedge on how “Good taste” often only reflects prevailing social, economic and political power bases.

For example,
The images of India that were circulated during the colonial rule of the British Raj by writers like Rudyard Kipling seem innocent but reveal an entrenched imperialist argument for white superiority and worldwide domination of other races, especially Asians. But race alone was not the issue for the British Raj, money was also a deciding factor. Thus, drawing also upon the ideas of French historian Michel de Cereal, cultural critics examined “The practice of everyday life”. Studying literature as an anthropologist would, as a phenomenon of culture, including a culture’s economy. Rather than determining which are the “best” works produced, cultural critics describe what is produced and how various productions relate to one another. They aim to reveal the political economic reasons why certain cultural product is more valued at certain times.

Transgressing of boundaries among discipline high and law can make cultural studies just plain fun.

For example,
A possible cultural studies research paper with the following title: The Birth of Caption Jack Sparrow: An Analysis”. For sources of Johnny Deep’s funky performance in Disney’s Pirates of the Caribbean, the curse of the Black Pearl (2003). You could research cultural topics ranging from the trade economies of the sea two hundred years ago, to real pirates of the Caribbean such as Blackbeard and Henry Morgan, then on the Robert Louis Stevenson’s Long John Silver in Treasure Island (1881).
4.  Cultural Studies analyses not only the cultural work, but also the means of production:

Marxist critics have long recognized the importance of such par literary questions as these: Who published his or her books and how are these books distributed? Who buys books? For that matter, who is literate and who is not? A well known analysis of literary production is Janice Radway’s study of the American romance novel and its readers, reading the romance women, patriarchy and popular literature, which demonstrates the textual effects of the publishing industry’s decisions about books that will minimize its financial risks. Another contribution is the collection reading in America, edited by Cathy N. Davidson, which includes essays on literature and gender in colonial New England, urban magazine audiences in 18th century New York City. The impact upon reading of such technical innovations as cheaper eye glasses, electric lights and trains, the book-of-the-month club and how writers and texts go through fluctuation of popularity and canonicity. These studies help us recognize that literature does not occur in a space separated from other concerns of over lives.

Cultural studies thus joins subjectively – that is, cultural in relation to individual lives – with engagement a direct approach to attacking social ills. Though cultural studies practitioners deny “humanism” or “the humanities” as universal categories, they strive reason”, which often resembles the goals and values of humanistic and democratic ideals. What difference does a cultural studies approach make for student? First of all, it is increasingly clear that by the year 2050 the United States will be demographers call a “Majority – Minority” population, that is the present numerical majority of “white”, “education” and  “Anglo-Americans” will be the minority, particularly with the dramatically increasing number of Latin / residents, mostly Mexican Americans. As Gerald Graff and James Phelan observe “It is a common prediction that the culture of the next century will put a premium on people’s ability to deal productively with conflict and cultural difference. To the question “Why teach the controversy?” they note that today a student can go from one class in which the values of western culture are prorated as hopelessly compromised by racism, sexism and homophobia. Professors can acknowledge these differences and encourage student to construct a conversation for themselves as “the most exciting part of their education”.

Conclusion:-

So here I write my own thoughts and understanding about four goals of cultural studies .in culture this main four goals are most important part for understanding the cultural studies. This theory came with many questions and here we can solve this issue with these goals.